In a decision released recently, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta in Hay v. Platinum Equities, 2012 ABQB 204 granted damages for the appropriation of personality of a “non-celebrity”.
-
IPPractice.ca
In a decision released recently, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta in Hay v. Platinum Equities, 2012 ABQB 204 granted damages for the appropriation of personality of a “non-celebrity”.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit released a decision earlier this week in Rosetta Stone v. Google, remanding issues of trademark infringement in the summary judgment appeal relating to Google’s AdWords program.
Judges were appointed today to the Ontario Court of Appeal, the Quebec Court of Appeal, the B.C. Court of Appeal, the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench, the Superior Court of Quebec, and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. In other judicial news, former Supreme Court Justice Ian Binnie has announced that he is joining Lenczner Slaght.
CIPO has released its consultation documents on patentable subject matter. The consultation period is open until May 2, 2012 and relates to both the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision in Amazon.com and diagnostic methods.
The first sound trademark was approved and advertised in today’s Canadian Trade-mark Journal – MGM’s roaring lion. The Canadian Intellectual Property Office announced that they will now be accepting applications for sound trademarks effective immediately.
The Copyright Board has released its reasons for denying a claim of Crown immunity by various provincial governments in Access Copyright’s request for a tariff on reproductions by government employees.The governments had challenged the legality of the tariff on the basis that tariffs under the Copyright Act did not apply to the government.
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued its decision on the patentability of correlation procedures in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Labs., Inc. The Court unanimously reversed the CAFC and held that the claims were effectively directed to laws of nature and therefore unpatentable.
An Ontario Court judge issued a decision this week bemoaning the lack of electronic court records: “I suppose that on a sunny, unusually warm, mid-March day one should be mellow and accept, without complaint, the systemic failures and delay of this Court’s document management system.”
Canadian lawyers disputed the ownership of the domain name <fertilitylawcanada.com> under the UDRP and in an arbitration decision released yesterday, the panel held that common names for areas of legal practice are generally non-distinctive and there was no secondary meaning in this case.
This website was honoured with being selected as “IP Pick of the Week” by IP Osgoode in its March 13, 2012 IPIGRAM. Thank you for the mention and support!