, 2007 FC 367 (Cefaclor*)

Justice Hughes - 2007-04-04

Read full decision. Automatically generated summary:

This is an appeal by Apotex Inc. from the Case Management Prothonotary who made an Order, inter alia, refusing to defer or bifurcate the issue of damages, or at least the quantification of damages, arising out of the claims asserted by Apotex as Plaintiff by Counterclaim under the provisions of the Competition Act.

Decision relates to:

  • T-1321-97 - ELI LILLY AND CO. ET AL v. APOTEX INC.


Canadian Intellectual Property