Decision

Bauer Hockey LTD v. Sport Maska Inc. D.B.A. CCM Hockey, 2018 FC 1200

Proth. Steele - 2018-11-28

Read full decision. Summary prepared by Alan Macek:

The Plaintiff, Bauer Hockey Ltd. [Bauer], brings a motion to strike allegations contained in the last sentence of paragraph 8, and paragraphs 51(b), 53 and 54 of the Defendant, Sport Maska Inc. d.b.a. CCM Hockey [CCM]’s, Statement of Defence and Counterclaim pursuant to Rule 221(1)(a) of the Federal Courts Rules [the Rules]on the basis that the impugned allegations do not support a claim under section 7(a) of the Trade-marks Act [the TMA]. Bauer requests that the allegations be struck without leave to amend. For the reasons set out herein, the Plaintiff’s motion shall be granted.

Decision relates to:

  • T-197-18 - BAUER HOCKEY LTD. v. SPORT MASKA INC (d.b.a. CCM HOCKEY)

 

Canadian Intellectual Property