Bauer Hockey Ltd v. Sport Maska Inc., 2020 FC 212
Justice Grammond - 2020-02-06
Read full decision. Automatically generated summary:
These reasons deal with three motions brought by the parties to a patent infringement action, seeking the exclusion of expert reports, in totality or in part. In its first motion, the defendant, which I will refer to as CCM, seeks the exclusion of an expert report that relies on information and documents regarding lost profits that the plaintiff, Bauer Hockey Ltd. [Bauer], refused to provide during discoveries as it represented that it would not be seeking damages based on lost profits. ... Both Bauer and CCM bring a motion concerning the reply evidence of the other’s expert, substantially for the same reason, namely that it would constitute improper reply.
Decision relates to:
- T-546-12 - BAUER HOCKEY CORP. v. SPORT MASKA INC. ET AL.