RE/MAX, LLC v. Save Max Real Estate Inc., 2022 FC 1268
Justice Fuhrer - 2022-09-07
Read full decision. Automatically generated summary:
RE/MAX LLC brings this motion under Rule 51 of the Federal Courts Rules, to appeal an order of Case Management Judge Ring [see 2021 CanLII 53761]. ... The proposed amendments fall into two categories, characterized by RE/MAX as follows: (a) Amendments clarifying the Defendants’ use of infringing trademarks by way of licence through the Defendants’ affiliate, Save Max International Inc., and sublicences to franchised brokerages and brokers in Canada; and (b) Amendments adding two more registered trademarks to the list of RE/MAX Trademarks allegedly infringed by the Defendants. ... For the above reasons, I am not persuaded that interference with CM Judge Ring’s discretionary decision to dismiss the RE/MAX’s Rule 75 motion is warranted in the circumstances.
Decision relates to:
- T-1049-18 - RE/MAX, LLC v. SAVE MAX REAL ESTATE, INC. ET AL.