Adeia Guides Inc. v. BCE Inc., 2024 FC 1470
Justice Fuhrer - 2024-09-18
Read full decision. Generated by ChatGPT:
The court considered a patent infringement case where the Plaintiffs sought to amend their statement of claim. The Defendants opposed the motion, leading to a dispute over adding "Additional Vendors" to the claim, which was partially allowed. However, the proposed amendments for "Additional Systems" were rejected as lacking material facts to support an infringement claim. The Plaintiffs argued that these systems were components of already listed systems. Upon review, the court found that the Associate Judge did not err in refusing these amendments, based on a palpable error standard and the legal test applied. The appeal was dismissed as the Associate Judge considered the pleading as a whole and did not make any overriding errors. Overall, the Plaintiffs' motion to appeal the Amendment Order was denied.
Decision relates to:
- T-1184-21 - ROVI GUIDES, INC. v. BCE INC. et Al.